Statistical Methods For Mineral Engineers -

Low-precision measurements (e.g., a problematic conveyor scale) get adjusted more than high-precision measurements (e.g., a calibrated lab balance). The output is a single, coherent set of production data. Part 6: Regression Analysis for Recovery Optimization Linear regression is the workhorse, but mineral processes are rarely linear. Logistic Regression Recovery is a proportion between 0 and 1. Linear regression can predict values outside this range ($>100%$). Logistic regression models the log-odds of recovery:

In the world of mineral engineering, decisions have billion-dollar consequences. A mill that operates at 85% recovery instead of 90% can render a deposit uneconomical. A misinterpreted assay grid can lead to the development of a barren hill. Unlike chemical engineering (which deals with pure reactants) or mechanical engineering (which deals with deterministic tolerances), mineral engineering must contend with heterogeneity . Statistical Methods For Mineral Engineers

For mineral engineers, this is revolutionary. Low-precision measurements (e

You are designing a sampling protocol for a leach feed. The grind size is $P_{80} = 75 \mu m$. You take a 200g pulp for analysis. The variance is acceptable. Now you need to sample crushed ore at $P_{80} = 10mm$ (10,000 $\mu m$). The particle size ratio is $10,000 / 75 = 133$. The mass required must increase by $133^3 \approx 2.35 \text{ million}$ times. $200g \times 2,350,000 = 470,000 kg$. Logistic Regression Recovery is a proportion between 0 and 1

$$ R(t) = R_{max} \cdot \frac{t^n}{K^n + t^n} $$

Where $\gamma(h)$ is the semivariance, $h$ is the lag distance, and $Z$ is the grade.