The entry was not dramatic. There was no smashed glass or kicked-in door. Instead, Portenza, a wiry man who had once worked as a locksmith, picked the rear kitchen lock in under ninety seconds. The two men entered the mudroom, stepped over Max the dog (who they had subdued with a sedative-laced steak), and made their way to the study. What transpired over the next four hours is a study in psychological terror. Unlike many home invasions that turn violent immediately, the perpetrators sought to extract information. They believed that a woman of DAngelo’s wealth would have a safe filled with cash and jewelry.
By the time police arrived five minutes later, the intruders had fled in a stolen Dodge Omni. They were apprehended two days later attempting to cross into Canada. The trial of Connecticut v. Portenza and Marchetti was a media circus. Sally DAngelo became an unlikely icon of resilience. Her testimony was lauded by prosecutors as "the most composed account of survival" they had ever witnessed. sally dangelo home invasion
Sally DAngelo was tied to a wooden dining chair with electrical cord. The invaders used a technique called "light torture"—shining high-intensity flashlights into her eyes while demanding the combination to a floor safe in the master bedroom closet. The safe, however, contained only estate documents and a pearl necklace. The entry was not dramatic
For four hours, Sally endured threats of violence. At one point, Portenza left the house to retrieve a blowtorch from his van, threatening to melt the soles of her feet if she did not reveal a hidden cache of money. There was no money. Sally DAngelo’s wealth was tied up in stocks and the house itself; she kept less than $200 in the house. The critical moment of the Sally DAngelo home invasion occurred at 12:47 AM. Marchetti, the younger and more nervous of the two, suggested they "cut their losses" and leave. Portenza disagreed, arguing they should kill the witness. The two men entered the mudroom, stepped over
