You have no items in your shopping cart.
A: Look for the laser-etched "MK-N 1822" on the face of the cylinder and a holographic serial sticker on the packaging. The Final Verdict: Is the Upgrade Worth It? If you currently rely on legacy 1822 hardware, the migration to the Multikey 1822 New is inevitable. The old patent has expired in many regions, leading to cheap blank availability and increased vulnerability. The "New" generation closes every known exploit.
For decades, the name has been synonymous with high-security mechanical locking systems. From government facilities to high-end residential estates, their pin-tumbler and disc-based mechanisms have set the standard for pick-resistance and key control. However, every industry giant eventually faces a crossroads: evolve or become obsolete. Enter the Multikey 1822 New —a system that is not merely an iteration, but a complete reimagining of mechanical key security. multikey 1822 new
A: Yes. The new front housing has a sacrificial snap-line that breaks away, leaving the core locked in place even if the outer cylinder is snapped. A: Look for the laser-etched "MK-N 1822" on
| Test | Old 1822 Result | Multikey 1822 New Result | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | | 45 seconds | 3 minutes 20 seconds | | Pick resistance (SKG scale) | 5 minutes | 47 minutes (test abandoned) | | Bump key resistance | Vulnerable | Immune (sidebar blocks bump) | | Key duplication via photo | Possible | Not possible (asymmetric milling) | The old patent has expired in many regions,
By: Security Hardware Gazette